Military-grade chemicals have left a dangerous mark on our environment and health. These substances, used for various purposes, tend to linger long after their initial use. Their lasting presence can be incredibly harmful, tainting water sources, soil , and wildlife. The consequences of this contamination are severe, impacting ecosystems and human health.
As we become more aware of these dangers, the need to address their impact grows more urgent. It’s crucial to act now to mitigate the damage and protect our environment. The Toxic Legacy of PFAS
Research published by MDPI mentions that per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ( PFAS ) have become infamous for their environmental and health impacts. Initially used for their water- and grease-resistant properties, these chemicals have seeped into water supplies, soil, and wildlife. Because PFAS are persistent, they can build up over time and are difficult to break down. The prevalence causes pollution, which poses major health concerns to people, such as liver damage and cancer.
One of the most problematic applications of PFAS has been in aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF), a firefighting agent used extensively by the military. AFFF contains high levels of PFAS and has led to widespread groundwater contamination near military bases and fire training areas . The contamination from AFFF is particularly concerning because it affects drinking water sources and can spread across large areas.
According to TruLaw, there have been numerous lawsuits filed by individuals and communities exposed to PFAS contamination. Notably, those serving in the military have reported high levels of AFFF exposure, leading to serious health issues. Lawsuits are seeking compensation for health problems linked to PFAS exposure and demanding better regulations and clean-up efforts. These legal actions highlight the urgent need for effective measures to address PFAS contamination.
As reported in a July 2024 update from the Lawsuit Information Center, a new lawsuit has been filed by a Georgia firefighter. This case is part of an AFFF lawsuit by Navy personnel, as the firefighter routinely used Class B foam. He also wore firefighting gear containing PFAS materials during his time at Memphis Naval Station. The lawsuit asserts that prolonged exposure to […]
The Fight Against Military-Grade Chemicals and Their Environmental Impact
